A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 14, 2014, the Defendant was the team leader of the C Mart located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the victim D was aware of the membership of the above Mart as the calculation source, and around December 30, 2014, the victim had a studio separate from the family house of the Defendant who was the victim who was in a house in a home in a home in order to cause the victim to have a studio in a separate way from the family house of the Defendant who was in a home in a home in a family in a way that he was in a two-time gender relationship with the victim who was provided convenience, thereby threatening the victim's husband to know that he was sexual intercourse with the victim, and tried to maintain an unlawful relationship with the victim.

1. The Defendant: (a) from January 10, 2015 to 19:16:12 on January 10, 2015, to 10:2, Namdong-gu, Incheon; and (b) three million won on the cell phone of the said victim;

The military system shall end up clean;

(b) They shall die and live in the house;

D. The Defendant demanded 3 million won, i.e., “the receipt after deducting two months from the value of the protection.” This demand that the victim give notice to the new Tagan, and repeatedly send an answer, i.e., “one time”, and “one time only”.

I think about it; or

The question is that the place referred to in the male test is the “nurbing in the face of money,” “Is to do so at a divorce home,” and “Isverging in the south of Korea” is the subject of money.

“Fr.s........”

Security System. The “satisf......”, “not on the face of the State,” and “at the face of money.”

The “satisfying to take place in the family place,” such as the “satisfy,” sent text messages 40 times, and the Defendant demanded her husband to know the fact of sexual intercourse and 3 million won if he did not give money at the time of 4 times of voice calls, but the victim did not comply with the said request due to the absence of money. However, the Defendant again requested the issuance of text messages at the same place from January 11, 2015 to from January 09:27, 17:14, to the victim’s cell phone.

required due to lack of time.

Madada, DC, and the last one time within the country, and there is no money so that they could not gather.

If the proposal is requested,

“Any person who has a right to answer” and “Any person who has a right to answer.”

There is no time to do so.

The term "surd, pet and well living";