logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.10.06 2015나3027
소유권보존등기말소등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that "A 7 of this case among the land of this case" among the land of this case No. 8, No. 8, 4, 5 of the first instance court's decision "A 3, 12, 2) No. 12 of the 7 of this case "A 3, 4 added the evidence No. 17 ", 2,00,000 won around January 6, 1970, "A 2,000 won around 6, 1970," and paid KRW 35,500 on October 10, 197, as stated in the reasoning for the first instance court's decision, since "a 12, 200 won was the same as the stated in the reasoning for the first instance court's decision," it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant Republic of Korea is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The plaintiff's remaining claims against the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow