1. As to the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff’s diagnosis and surgery on January 2013, 201.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related Plaintiff is an intention to operate the building building in Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City and D Council members (hereinafter “Plaintiff Council members”) on the eightth floor, and the Defendant was a person who had undergone cancer examination at the Plaintiff’s Council members.

B. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant’s cancer examination at the Plaintiff’s source (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s source”) was conducted by the National Health Insurance Corporation on a regular cancer examination conducted by the National Health Insurance Corporation, and the Plaintiff was requested to read the results of the above film to X-ray E on the same day, and thereafter, the Plaintiff presented the Plaintiff’s opinion that “the Plaintiff recommended to read the results of the above film film examination” to “75-10% of the quantity of the distributed quantity of the anti-decover oil release release,” and “the recommendation for the examination of the recover of the anti-decovering news.” (ii) On June 26, 2012 based on the result of the above procover film examination, the Plaintiff sent a notice of the results of the procover cancer examination to the Defendant on a regular basis as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant cancer examination” in total, among the procedures that the Plaintiff undertaken in connection with the Defendant’s geneam cancer examination from June 14, 2012 to June 26, 2012. There is no discovery of any specific circumstance, or any special circumstance.

The period of time to undergo a regular medical examination after two years.

However, since it may be difficult to find a disease in the case of a stoves, it is necessary to conduct a tracking test through a stoves test.In the case of clinical symptoms such as a stoves or a stoves and a stoves, it is necessary to visit a medical institution to provide consultation about whether to conduct an additional test.

C. On November 14, 2012, the Defendant was diagnosed by the F Hospital that the U.S. was suspected of the U.S. cancer on the left chest of the Defendant as a result of the medical examination. 2) After the medical examination, the Defendant was diagnosed by G Hospital to have three U.S. cancer, and on December 6, 2012, the Defendant was diagnosed to have three U.S. cancer.