logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2013.12.03 2013가합2637
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 125,390,766 and KRW 49,472,704 among them, Defendant A shall be from November 23, 201 to December 5, 2012.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff newly constructed and sold the F apartment in Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-si (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"), in collaboration with the non-party KS Construction Co., Ltd., Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd., 200, 200, 200, and 38, 2000. The defendants succeeded to the status of the seller of this case as to the apartment of this case from the buyer who signed the sales contract with the plaintiff et al.

Plaintiff

On March 31, 2008, between the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation and the new bank (hereinafter “the instant lending institution”), the instant lending institution loaned intermediate payments to the buyers of the instant apartment complex on the date of the payment of intermediate payments on the sales contract, and the lending interest rate was applied to the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (0.8% of the base interest rate for loans of three months CD-dong, and to the new bank (hereinafter “the instant lending agreement”) with the rate of 0.8% of the base interest rate for loans of three months-long CD-dong, and to the rate of 0.8% of the distribution profit rate for three months-long CD-dong, the new bank (hereinafter “the instant lending agreement”). If the Plaintiff et al. first appropriated the principal and interest of loans to the down payment and intermediate payment received from the buyer, and if any obligation remains after appropriation, the Plaintiff et al. jointly and severally concluded an intermediate payment agreement (hereinafter “the instant lending agreement”).

The Defendants succeeded to the status of each seller of the sales contract for the apartment of this case with the Plaintiff, etc. as listed below (hereinafter the Defendants succeeded to each of the above sales contract of this case) (the Defendants paid 5% of the supplied amount as down payment as listed below.

In addition, the Defendants are from the lending institution of this case in accordance with the loan agreement of this case.

arrow