logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2015.09.22 2015가단7329
임금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally indicated the “amount claimed by the selected parties” list in the attached Form to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the designated parties.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Plaintiff, etc.”) jointly operated by the Defendants, worked for each of the periods indicated in the “period of work” table in the “amount claimed by the appointed parties” list in the “amount claimed by the designated parties” list in the separate sheet in the “amount claimed by the designated parties” list, and the Defendants did not pay the Plaintiff, etc. the amount of wages equivalent to each of the money indicated in the “amount claimed by the designated parties” list in the separate sheet in the separate sheet shall be deemed to have been led by the Defendant pursuant to Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant may be recognized by each of the statements in subparagraphs A and 2

B. According to the above facts of recognition, pursuant to Article 57(1) of the Commercial Act, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff, etc. 20% interest per annum from March 28, 2015 to the day of full payment under the Labor Standards Act, as sought by the Plaintiff, etc., for each of the unpaid wages and each of them, 14 days following the 14 days following the date of the final retirement of the Plaintiff, etc., as agreed by the Plaintiff, etc.

C. As to this, Defendant C asserted that the amount of benefits sought by the Plaintiff, etc. is excessive, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the above Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff et al.'s claims against the defendants of the plaintiff et al. shall be accepted in its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow