1. The defendant falls under the "amount claimed by the selected parties" list in attached Form 1 to the plaintiff (appointed parties) and the selected parties.

1. In full view of the purport of the evidence No. 1-1 and No. 2 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party (hereinafter "the plaintiff, etc.") are employed by the defendant and retired from office as a management worker for the period indicated in the "period of service" list of the "amount claimed by the appointed party" list of the attached Table, but the defendant did not receive wages and retirement allowances from the defendant. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs the amount stated in the "total amount of claim" column in the above table and the damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act from the date of each day to the date of full payment.

2. The defendant's assertion that the defendant should deduct the claim for reimbursement against the plaintiff (appointed party) since it has a claim for reimbursement. However, the materials submitted by the defendant alone are insufficient to recognize that the defendant has a claim for reimbursement against the plaintiff (appointed party), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the claim of this case by the plaintiff et al. is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.