The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the defendant, at the time of the instant traffic accident, can be found to have escaped without taking any measures, despite recognizing that the victim E suffered bodily injury due to the instant traffic accident.

However, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the charge of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dok-in Vehicle) on the ground that the defendant cannot be found guilty of the criminal intent of escape.

2. Based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below's determination that the defendant cannot be punished as a crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes on the ground that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, based on its stated reasoning, is insufficient to recognize that the defendant was proven to the extent that there was no reasonable doubt as to the occurrence of the instant traffic accident and the victim's bodily injury due to the accident, and there is no other evidence to recognize it, and there is no error of misunderstanding of facts as alleged in the grounds for appeal.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.