logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.02.21 2016고단1021
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 1, 2016, the Defendant posted a letter to sell “ Soviet 4 in gallon gallon,” on the Internet NAVV, a national car page around July 1, 2016, and said that if 190,000 won is paid to the victim F, he/she would send the said article.

However, in fact, the defendant did not send a cell phone to the victim F and thought that he would use it for food expenses, etc. necessary for living in old age without sending the cell phone to the victim F and therefore did not have any intention or ability to sell the cell phone to the victim F.

The Defendant received 190,000 won from the Victim F to the Nong Bank account (I) in the name of H, and acquired 3,279,000 won in total through 29 times from the victims as shown in the List of Crimes 1.

On February 18, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice on the Internet NAVVV and the Korean car page “Stop” at around 14:00 on February 18, 2015, and made a false statement to the victim J that reported and contacted “to send the said goods if it transfers KRW 400,000.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not send the above goods to the victim and thought that he would use them for accommodation expenses, etc., so there was no intention or ability to sell visual visibility to the victim.

The defendant received 400,000 won from the damaged person to the Saemaul Treasury (K) account in the name of the defendant, and acquired it by fraud.

On October 5, 2014, the Defendant up to 2016, posted a statement on the sales site of Internet goods using a mobile phone in the original room in which the Defendant living in Sungwon-si L, Changwon-si, the Defendant sold the HE on the Internet goods and then sold the HE to the victim M. who reported and contacted with it.

A false statement was made.

However, at the time of fact, the defendant only thought that he would use the money for living expenses by receiving money from the injured party, but does not have a Hphone.

arrow