logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.01.20 2015나25688
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification or correction as follows. Thus, this case is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In accordance with the attached Forms 15 through 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "purchase of 1/2 shares among the real estate listed in attached Forms 2 through 16" shall be changed to "purchase and purchase of 1/2 shares among the entire land indicated in attached Forms 2 through 5."

B. On April 22, 1998, the first instance court’s decision was corrected to “ April 22, 1998” as “ April 13, 1998.”

C. Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court is to change "D and E" to "I's children D and E.

The first instance court’s third page 10 to 11 stated “one-half shares in the real estate among the instant real estate and one-half through five real estate,” respectively, shall be changed to “the instant real estate.”

E. On the third page of the judgment of the first instance court, the “real estate” in the name F among the instant real estate is changed to the “instant real estate”.

F. The “2 to 5 real estate out of the instant real estate” stated in Forms 1 through 2 of the first instance court’s decision is changed to “1/2 of the entire land indicated in Forms 2 through 5 of the attached Table 1.”

2. The main claim part of the lawsuit in this case is unlawful and dismissed. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim against the defendants shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified with this conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow