A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment on April 10, 2009 and four months of imprisonment on August 25, 2009 by the Busan District Court, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment in the Busan Detention Center on January 7, 2010. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 15 of the same year.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 13, 2012, the Defendant suffered from the victim E (the age of 48), who is an employee, from the victim F (the age of 64), the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in the Dda located in C on May 13, 2012; (b) was demanded from the victim F (the age of 64) to take the word “an employee with multiple persons”; (c) the Defendant was able to take the face of the above F at once in drinking; (d) was fleeped by her head by her hand; and (e) was fleeped by her head by her hand; and (e) was fleeped twice in the floor of the above E kylbial, and (e) was flick by drinking.

As a result, the Defendant committed the victim F with approximately 2 weeks of knee-free gambling, etc., and the victim E with approximately 10 days of kne-free therapy, and with the injury of the gne-free gambling of the oral mouth, respectively.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim G(s)’s husband, who was the husband of the above F F, against the Defendant’s conduct, such as the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) at the time and place.

3. On May 14, 2012, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report of the same content as that set forth in paragraph (1) from the Ddade in front of the Dda that was located in Si/Sim-si on May 14, 2012; and (b) received inquiries from the relevant slope I of the instant police box, etc. who was called out, and took a desire not to put in his/her entrance; and (c) assaulted the instant I’s face.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.Each of the F, E, G, and I.