logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.05.31 2015가단51527
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from April 18, 2012 to May 31, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is an employer who employs the Plaintiff as a person who implements a forest project, such as forest tending and preventing blight and harmful insects, and the Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant and was killed in the event of an accident.

나. 원고는 2012. 4. 18. 16:00경 피고가 시행하던 강원 홍천군 B 소재 ‘C 사업‘ 현장에서 벌목작업을 하다가, 피고가 고용한 D이 기계톱으로 큰 나무 한 그루를 벌목함에 있어, D과 E가 미리 약속한 신호체계도 없이 육성으로만 같이 작업하던 근로자들에게 벌목사실을 알리고 벌목을 하는 바람에 D이 벌목한 나무가 쓰러지는 과정에서 옆에 있던 다른 나무에 부딪친 뒤 튕겨 나오며 방향을 틀어 인근에서 벌목작업 중이던 원고가 이를 알지 못하고 있다가 쓰러지는 위 나무에 맞아 좌측 어깨 관절 부위에서의 상완 신경총 손상 등의 상해를 입었다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [The ground for recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap’s evidence No. 1, Eul’s evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. According to the facts acknowledged as above, E, an employee of the defendant, has been negligent in assigning sufficiently wide range of work between workers in consideration of the size, etc. of the wooden trees, having determined a certain signal method in the wooden work and inform the plaintiff and D of the specific signal method, having the D in charge of the wooden work give the signal to them, and neglecting the duty of education and supervision to ensure the safe evacuation of other workers by properly observing the wooden trees.

In addition, in the process of punishing D also, there was an error of neglecting the evacuation of the plaintiff working in the vicinity by warning other workers to a large extent so that other workers can easily be identified, and the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of such E and D.

As such, the defendant is the user of E and D in this case.

arrow