logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.08.11 2017고정123
자격모용사문서작성등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Preparation of private documents for qualification solicitation and display of private documents for qualification solicitation;

A. On January 19, 2015, the Defendant entered into a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) on the purchase of land and buildings (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in the D coffee shop located in Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, E (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

Although the Defendant did not have been authorized by G to conclude the instant sales contract at the time, the Defendant entered “ Address: Address: H, Resident Registration Number: I, J, and Name: G” in the column of the buyer of the sales contract, and entered “A” as the agent “A” in the form of the agent.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant prepared a copy of the real estate transaction contract, which is a private document on rights and obligations, by gathering the qualification of G's agent.

B. The Defendant submitted one copy of the real estate sale contract, which was prepared by gathering the qualification of G’s agent at the above date, at the above time and place, to the above E, a real estate seller who is aware of such reproduction.

2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On January 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) prepared the text stating, “If a complaint is filed, he/she will actively respond to the investigation; (b) details that he/she did not pay any interest to the Credit Union; and (c) entered into a contract with the first floor on the condition that he/she uses it; and (d) placed in advance on the name of G in the answer column.”

G has made the G seal affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a written reply in the G name on proof of fact.

B. At the above date, the Defendant is not aware of the forgery through one office, one office, in the note of the Administration, of the forged G name.

arrow