1. The plaintiff's appeal and the main claim expanded in the trial and the additional conjunctive claim are dismissed, respectively.

2...

Basic Facts

A. On January 5, 2001, the Defendant concluded the instant insurance contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as the contractor and the insured.

B. On June 26, 2004, the Defendant received insurance money of KRW 64,475,685 in total, including the day of hospitalization, injury, and medical expenses, as stated in the attached Table 2, including the receipt of insurance money of KRW 2,400,00 from the Plaintiff based on the instant insurance contract, on the ground that the Defendant took place on June 26, 2004.

C. Meanwhile, between June 10, 1992 and May 19, 2004, the Defendant subscribed to 17 insurance as shown in the status of conclusion of the attached Table 3 insurance contracts. Based on each insurance contract, the Defendant received insurance proceeds of KRW 305,634,275 in total as stated in each item of the insurance proceeds received in the same list.

[Based on the facts] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 11, 17 (including each number), each statement of the first instance court's interest, fire and marine insurance company, Samsung life insurance company, Hansung life insurance company, future life insurance company, post office and financial development institute, H hospitals, E council members, and each inquiry reply to B hospital. Results of the first instance court's response to the submission of each information on financial transactions to Nonghyup life insurance company, Nonghyup life insurance company, and Nonghyup life insurance company, and the first instance court's response to each order to submit each information on financial transactions to Eul life insurance company, the first instance court's response to the submission of each information on financial transactions to Eul life insurance company, the second instance court's response to the submission of each information on financial transactions to Eul company, the second instance court's response to the submission of each information on D council members, and the defendant entered into the insurance contract of this case for the purpose of denying the insurance payment through multiple insurance contracts. Thus, the insurance contract of

Accordingly, this case's insurance contract is sought to confirm the invalidity of the contract.

B. The insurance contract of this case is null and void around the claim for monetary payment, and the defendant receives the attached Table 2 insurance money.