1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases or in addition, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In the part of the first instance trial, the entry of “A” in the third column of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written with “A evidence Nos. 1 and 9-2”.

The third part of the third part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court shall be "in the bank account in the name of the defendant" to "in the name of the defendant as the account of community credit cooperatives in the name of the defendant."

The grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: "A evidence 6, 7" of the 21st part of the 3rd part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be raised with "A evidence 5 through 7".

The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court is that the phrase “not to work” in the 4th and 11th of the 4th judgment is “not to work, and the money transferred by E to D prior to the preparation of the loan certificate on April 1, 2006 is merely two million won.”

The grounds for the judgment of the first instance court are as follows: “No. 209 April 20, 2009” in the third sentence of the fifth instance shall be added.

The grounds of the judgment of the first instance court are as follows: "2.2.2" in the 5th sentence of the 6th judgment "209.2.3" and the 6th sentence " February 6, 2009" respectively.

The grounds for the judgment of the first instance court shall be as follows in the part of the 6th to 15th "(i)".

“The Defendant borrowed KRW 150 million from the Seocho Saemaeul Community Fund on March 6, 2008 to the due date on March 12, 2011 and the interest rate of KRW 200 million on March 12, 201, and the Bank of Korea’s base interest rate of KRW 5% per annum on March 2008 shall be added to the following facts: “The fact that the base interest rate of KRW 150 million in the Bank of Korea on March 12, 2008 is significant in this court or that it may be recognized by taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings in the statement in No. 15)” in the first instance judgment “A evidence 4-1 and 2” in the front of the “contest” under the 7th 12th 7th 12th 201.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is accepted.