logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 08. 16. 선고 2018두43569 판결
(심리불속행) 8년 이상 이 사건 농지를 직접 경작하였음을 전제로 하는 원고의 주장은 받아들일 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu72401 (2018.04.04)

Title

The plaintiff's assertion based on the premise that the farmland of this case was directly cultivated for not less than 8 years is not acceptable.

Summary

(C) Where a farmland owner directly cultivates only sporadicly on the ground that he/she has an occupation other than agriculture, he/she shall be excluded from capital gains tax reduction or exemption.

Related statutes

Article 69 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act for Self-Cultivating Farmland

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appellant’s ground of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, it is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow