All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant was too unfasible and unfair, while the prosecutor filed each appeal by asserting that the Defendant was too unfasible and unfair.

2. The judgment of the defendant has the record of having been punished four times for the same crime, and the criminal liability for committing the crime of this case again is not easy during the period of the same repeated crime for which the defendant was released on September 3, 2015 due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny).

On the other hand, the defendant found the physical card from the cell phone case of the victim E, which was left for filling with an employee at singing points, and agreed to pay 4 million won to the above victim at the court below.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following factors, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the argument regarding the sentencing of the Defendant and the Prosecutor is difficult to accept.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.