(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.22 2018고정651

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.22 2018고정651

강제추행

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On January 2, 2018, from around 21:00 to around 02:00 on January 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed an indecent act by drinking alcohol with the victim D (the name of the victim, inns, age 19) while drinking alcohol with the victim D; and (b) talking with the Defendant for an indecent act by force.

At around 03:00 on January 3, 2018, the Defendant committed an indecent act by coercioning the victim’s chest by inserting his/her hand between the drunk victim and the victim’s bridge while talking with him/her. The Defendant committed an indecent act by coercioning the victim’s chest by inserting his/her left hand under the victim’s titts.

2. Determination

A. The record reveals that the victim’s statement is not consistent.

1) The victim testified in this court. At the time of the instant case, at the singing room, the defendant made twice the kis on the victim's kis, and the extent of the kis on the part side of the chest was limited to the victim's kis, and the behavior was not against the victim's will. After that, the defendant continued to spread three times the part of the victim's kis on the part of the victim's kis on three occasions. The victim testified that the victim's kis on the part of the victim's chest, the defendant's kis on the part of the defendant's kis on the part of the defendant's kis.

2) However, in the police investigation conducted two times earlier, the victim made a statement to the effect that he was "the kis from the defendant" (the 89th page of the investigation record), and that "the defendant first gave the victim's left chests and sound part of the victim's chests by hand, the victim's ppuri, and the defendant's continued kis, but the victim's face was refused to return to the victim's face, but the victim could not have been forced to do so later (the 11-4 side of the investigation record), and the victim stated to the effect that the kis or chests, etc. first in the investigation were forced to take place (the 11-4 side of the investigation record), are inconsistent with the above testimony.

3) The act of delivery of kis, chests and fry, and the act of delivery of frys and chests.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.15 2018고단1089

-서울동부지방법원 2019.08.23 2019노20

-서울북부지방법원 2019.02.21 2018고단3020

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.29 2015고단1132

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.04.10 2017고합195