The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant,

A. On February 2, 2017, in order to prevent the theft by taking advantage of the gaps in which the market price of 60,000 won owned by the victim D (M. 44) was neglected to monitor two parts of the market price owned by the victim D (M. 44). (B) around March 30, 2017, around 21:57, at the same place as above, nine fire parts of 90,000 won of the market price owned by the victim D were stolen by the aforementioned method.

On April 2, 2017, around 22:10, at the same place as above, the victim D’s market price was 60,000 won (e.g., 60,000,000 won) and was stolen by the above methods.

On May 7, 2017, around 20:30, at the same place as above, the victim D’s market price was 10,000 won deep by the above method. Accordingly, the Defendant stolen goods equivalent to 220,000 won, over four occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Investigation Report - Application of CCTV analysis legislation related to the crime committed on March 30, 2017

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (100,000 won per day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1548, Apr. 1, 200