logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.25 2016나2077910
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is that “18:51” in Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance was “18:51,” and the Plaintiffs asserted that the deceased was transferred to the Defendant hospital at around 18:0,00 based on the transitional records (Evidence 5-3 of the evidence No. 5) prepared by G. However, G did not have any medical examination and treatment of the deceased by the time of death, and the record is deemed to have been made after the deceased’s death. Therefore, it is difficult to view that the time of the re-explosion mentioned

On the other hand, the nursing records prepared by the nurse of the emergency room (A evidence 5-1) who directly treated the deceased are indicated as 18:51, and the above vision is the accurate internal time of the deceased, as it is stated as 18:51.

Except for the addition of the following ‘2. Additional Judgment' as to the argument that the plaintiff emphasizes or added in this court, it is the cause of the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In addition, the Plaintiffs showed the deceased’s opinion on the abnormal heart level at the first time of internal organs, and the symptoms of the upper part and the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic.

l.p. g., p.

arrow