logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.07 2016가합518135
임금
Text

1. The defendant's letter of "amount of money requested" in attached Form 2 to the plaintiffs as stated in the "amount of money requested" and the defendant's letter of money as to this.

Reasons

. Around July of the following year, part of the performance-based incentives (amounting to 70% based on the result of the organizational evaluation of departments) was first paid on August 2015, as the agreement between labor and management on the implementation of the evaluation was delayed in the case of an individual performance evaluation in 2014.

The “Personal Performance Evaluation Manual (WU)” was determined on October 30, 2015 through gathering consensus on October 7, 2015 and October 8, 2015, and the individual performance evaluation was conducted on November 16, 2015, and the amount of performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based performance-based payment rate x 135% x 10% x 10% x 905% x x x x 5% of performance- performance- payment- performance- payment- payment- payment- payment- payment- payment- day.

B. Examining the above facts in light of the legal principles as seen earlier, performance-based incentives that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiffs may vary according to the public institution’s management evaluation and internal management performance evaluation for the previous year, but once the payment rate is determined based on the previous year’s evaluation, the amount is determined as remuneration for the work for the pertinent year regardless of the performance of the pertinent year

arrow