Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for two years, for six months, for Defendant B’s imprisonment for one year and six months, for Defendant C, and for Defendant D and E.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On May 14, 2015, Defendant E was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 22, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 22, 2015. On April 14, 2016, Defendant E was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Suwon District Court on April 14, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 30, 2016.
[Criminal facts] 2016 Highest 739
1. Defendant A and L commit joint crimes with Defendant A and L, using the fact that the name “M” and the ordinary people operating in the Korea Housing Finance Corporation with financial resources from the National Housing Fund, and the loan of the entire housing loan for workers consisting solely of document screening without due diligence, the “M” plays a role of issuing a false certificate of employment to Defendant A. Defendant A plays a false tenant’s role, and L intended to acquire the loan of the entire housing loan from the victim bank by taking the role of false lessor in his/her name under his/her name N.
Defendant
A around June 2013, upon receipt of a false certificate of employment under the name of the (State) Filisung Tourism that Defendant A will work for the Filisung Tourism from “M”, Defendant A and L prepared a false lease agreement with Defendant A stating that Defendant A will lease the above apartment from N as a whole with respect to O apartment units 819 Dong 1002, in the time of n's e-owned e-ownership, and Defendant A submitted a false certificate of employment and a false contract of lease (former lease) with Defendant A, who applied for a loan of 100 million won to the person in charge of borrowing the coal branch of the Korean bank.
L was transferred KRW 100,000 from the victim bank to the N in the name of a loan for full-time employee on June 28, 2013.
Accordingly, Defendant A and L were delivered property by deceiving the victim in collusion with “M”.
2. The Defendants’ joint crime Defendant C suffered economic difficulties due to stock investment loss, resulting in the introduction of Defendant D, known to the general public, thereby resulting in Defendant E’s name in full.