A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 8, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Measures Taken after Accidents), the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving), and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Act No. 11835, Jun. 8, 2013), driving a vehicle with BM5 automobiles not mandatory insurance without a driver’s license, and driving a dynamic-electronic front of that vehicle, which is located within the nautical miles of the east-nam Navy, south-nam Sea-Eup, Gwangju Bank, toward the south terminal

At the time, it is night and its location is where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, so in such cases, there was a duty of care to thoroughly operate the driver in the front line and to safely operate the car line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led to the collision between the driver's seat of the Defendant and the driver's seat of the Defendant's vehicle, which occurred in normal course due to the negligence of driving the center line.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence above, destroyed the damaged vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 105,655,00 for repair costs, but did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, and escaped without taking necessary measures.

2. On October 12, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving) led the Defendant to drive a BMF5 car without a driver's license on October 23, 2013, and drive the BMF5 car on the nautical miles in front of the entrance of the e-sports park in the e-sports zone in the e-sports zone in the e-sports Eup/

At the time, the location is night, and it was a one-lane road in which the center line of yellow solid lines is installed. In such a case, there was a duty of care to refrain from overtaking any person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and intrudes the central line as it is, and overtaking it.

The victim E is driving due to negligence that return to the lane rapidly.