The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who coverage, prepares, or edits articles to be published in the above newspaper while working as a regional presiding official.

On September 2013, 2013, the Defendant called “F probability Packing Corporation” (hereinafter “victim Company”) at the place where the victim E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) is in progress at the Habnman BY, and called “If the construction work on the road is carried out, civil petitions have to occur due to various problems, such as dust generation, and such talks must come into the Korean flager test.” However, the Defendant took the same attitude to publish the environment, safety issues, etc. of the said construction site, if it does not demand money and valuables as advertising expenses.”

As such, the Defendant saw the above G to drink and drink it, and the name of H newspaper around October 10, 2013 was D and the name of the food company is H where the name of the victimized company was transferred from G to H.

1.10,000 won was remitted through the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the Agricultural Cooperative (I).

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

2. Determination

A. The facts charged in a criminal trial must be proven by the prosecutor, and the conviction for guilt should be based on evidence of probative value sufficient to have a judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Unless there is such evidence, the judgment of guilt should be based on the benefit of the defendant even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant.

Intimidation, which is the means of the crime of threat, means of threat, means to limit the freedom of decision-making of people or to interfere with the freedom of decision-making.