The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The Defendant is a representative director of Internet newspaper-private DNA who has jurisdiction over the Chungcheongbuk and Sejong area and is in charge of the operation of newspaper company.

On April 2014, the Defendant stated to the effect that, at the office of the elderly citizens and the office of the Cheongju-si, a senior citizen with disabilities and the office of the Cheongju-si, a senior citizen with disabilities and the office of the Cheongju-si, a public official in charge of the supervision of the Cheongju-si, who is a public official in charge of the management of the Cheongju-si, “E”, “the noise level is too serious due to the construction site, and due to the construction-related ready-mixed vehicle, it is too high to the bereaved family members who are unable to attend, and there is a lot of civil complaints.” However, if the Defendant did not give money and valuables demanded as advertising expenses due to the lack of the circumstances of the company, it is difficult to do so, the Defendant took the same attitude that the above construction site should be published, and the content of the Cheongju-si, a public official in charge of supervision of the site, etc., which caused disadvantages to the victim H 42.

The Defendant, as such, was transferred 1.1 million won by using the No. D’s account (I) around April 30, 2014 to the victim’s name in the name of the Defendant, who received the said talk from H, to drink F and H, and received money from the victim’s employees in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

2. Determination

가. 우선, 이 법원에서 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인이 위 공소사실 기재 일자 무렵 F에게 창간한 지 얼마되지 않는 주간( 週刊) 신문인 위 D를 위한 광고 협찬을 부탁한 사실 및 그에 따라 F이 H에게 요청하여 G 주식회사로 하여금 위 공소사실 기재와 같이 D에 광고 명목의 협찬을 하도록 한 사실은 인정된다.

B. However, we agree with the Defendant on the advertisement.