logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.26 2019고정557
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at Suwon District Court on June 2, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 10, 2016.

The defendant is the owner of the automobile B.

No automobile owner shall operate an automobile on the road on which no mandatory insurance has been subscribed.

Nevertheless, at around 10:26 December 13, 2015, the Defendant operated the said automobile which was not covered by mandatory insurance at a point 500m radius from the front line of the amban-si, amban-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Compacting the non-insurance running cars;

1. Maternity of the insurance contract;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, inquiry into investigation records, list of related cases, application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 39(1) of the Exempted Criminal Act [In light of the substance of the crime of this case, even if the defendant rendered a judgment simultaneously with the final judgment rendered by the defendant, it does not seem that the punishment would have become more severe

arrow