logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.19 2016고단8854
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 18, 2016, at around 09:28, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in means of public transportation by continuously contacted the Defendant’s grandchildren by attaching even after the victim G (V, 23 years of age) in the electric train run in F Station from the subway E line located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around August 18, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, I, and G;

1. Although the victim did not want a large punishment against the defendant, the victim at the time did not fall off one time at her her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or am or her m or her m or am or her sm or her m or her m or her m or her

A relatively clear statement was made by the victim without any reason to make a false or exaggerated statement, and according to the statement, the person who takes care of the victim's surroundings cannot be deemed to have taken care of others due to the fact that the defendant was aware of others. Thus, it can be sufficiently recognized that there was a physical contact with the victim who could be suspected of committing an indecent act on the part of the defendant.

B. In this context, the witness H and I, who is a police officer that discovered the instant crime as a member of the Asia subway Police Team, made a statement of witness H and I, and the contents of the video that the above police officer showed in the course of committing the crime, that is, the defendant was attached to the victim, and the defendant was forced to turn back to the victim immediately after the victim again. However, even though the defendant was seated immediately and there was a space to some extent, the defendant was able to look at the direction of the victim rather than the direction of the victim and the victim was pushed down to the victim.

arrow