logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.25 2015고단3488
상습절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] From July 16, 2010 to August 31, 2012, the Defendant received a decision to transfer juvenile protection cases 14 times from the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office due to special larceny, etc., and received a decision to transfer the case to the juvenile department once at the Gwangju District Court. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum term of one year and short term of ten months at the Gwangju District Court sentenced to larceny, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 26, 2015 in the Gwangju Prison.

【Criminal Facts】

1. From June 14, 2015 to September 1, 2015, the Defendant habitually stolen money and valuables worth KRW 4,272,000,00, totaled from a vehicle 12 times a total of 12 times, soup or parked, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, from a male toilet to a place where a wall was originally located, the victim E discovered a locker at the entrance of a soup park located in Gwangju Mine-gu, the victim E, who was divingd, and brought up the locker, and then took up the 169,000,000 in cash from a male toilet to a place where the wall was located.

2. Violation of the 2015 Highest 3741 Fraudulent, Specialized Credit Financial Business Act;

A. On July 3, 2015, around 17:00, the Defendant, who committed a crime at convenience stores, was willing to use the H credit card in the name of H that was stolen from “G” located in “G” located in “Seoul Northern-gu, Gwangju, and at around 17:22 on the same day, the Defendant, upon purchasing tobacco from “J” located in “J” located in “Seoul North-gu, Gwangju, presented that the Defendant paid the H credit card in the name of the business owner as if the Defendant was a legitimate right of use.

However, the defendant did not have any legitimate right to use the above credit card, and even if he purchased tobacco from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the price normally.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received from the victim the amount of KRW 4,500 tobacco equivalent to the market value of KRW 4,500.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, used a stolen credit card.

(b).

arrow