beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Error of facts and misapprehension of legal principles did not use a tangible power, such as plucking, plucking, etc. of damaged police officers, and even if the Defendant exercised a tangible power, there was no intention of injury or obstruction of performance of official duties.
B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and eight hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the defendant asserts that he did not exercise the tangible power by plucking, plucking, etc. of the victimized police officers, and that even if he exercised the tangible power as above, he did not have the intention of obstruction of performance of official duties or of injury during his commission.
However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below and the court below: ① the defendant recognized all the facts charged in this case at the investigative agency and the court below; ② the video of the suspect arrested at the scene of the crime committed in the crime committed in the crime committed in the crime committed in the crime committed in D was confirmed by the defendant's hand to take away the left hand of the damaged police officer; ③ at the time, the defendant attempted to conceal the fact of driving in the crime committed in the manner of driving in D; ③ the defendant also tried to make a statement that "I want to drink so far. I want to dice, I will have tried to stop the police officer's investigation; ④ at the time of arrest of a flagrant offender in the crime committed in the crime committed in the above video, the defendant's act seems to have interfered with the arrest of D while going back to the scene of arrest; ⑤ The defendant's act, including the victimized police officer, was committed in the manner that the defendant did not respond to the warning of the harm to the police officer's left hand.