1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff of the parties is a person who operates the G Private Teaching Institutes (hereinafter “the instant private teaching institutes”) and the Defendant operates the E Broadcasting Station and E website (F) as a corporation for the purpose of broadcasting business.

B. The broadcast content 1 of “H” as of September 14, 2018, the Defendant, in the news program “H” as of September 14, 2018, is running a school by having the German government recognize a master certificate, and receiving KRW 0,000 to students. However, most of them are merely certificates of completion which are not certificates of actual qualification,” as shown in attached Table 3, stating that “H” as of September 14, 2018 (hereinafter “instant report”).

(2) Under the title of the report of this case / [I], the Defendant posted the caption “ing students by creating domestic famous and similar lectures,” and displayed the standing signboards of the instant private teaching institute, which are part of the signboards of the instant private teaching institute on the background screen, and displayed on the website of the instant private teaching institute as related materials.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 9 (if available, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff is running only the process of acquiring the Florgegeur, which is a certificate of display issued by the German Chamber of Commerce and Industry in the instant private teaching institute, and the Plaintiff did not advertise to the effect that he would obtain a certificate of a master for display, which is officially recognized by the German Government, or not recruited students, but the Defendant sent the signboards, standing signboards, Internet homepage contents, etc. on the page of the instant report to the Plaintiff by deceiving the students of the instant private teaching institute to obtain a false certificate of qualification. 2) The Defendant reported that the Plaintiff had obtained a false certificate of qualification.