logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.06 2016고정60
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2, 2015, the Defendant listened to the questions that the victim called “A” in the “E cafeteria operated by the Victim D (V, 68 years of age) of Suwon-si, Suwon-si on July 2, 2015, and read “A” to F, thereby drinking the victim.

E. B. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.

2. On July 8, 2015, the Defendant at the same place on July 20:0, at the same time, interferes with the restaurant business of the victimized party by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) franchising francing franc; (b) francing francing francing franc; and (c) francing francing francing francing francing;

3. On July 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the entrance of the same place around 17:40 on July 9, 2015: (b) deemed that she carried she would sell shea and shea shea shea and Fran shea shea.

Doz.

Doz. Doz. Doz. Do.

“To interfere with the restaurant business of the injured party by making customers leave his or her place, thereby hindering the business of the victimized party;

4. On July 13, 2015, the Defendant 20:40, around the entrance of the same place, took the body of the victim in good hands and scam, and scam the body of the victim, and obstructed the restaurant business of the victimized person by getting the victim to leave the place, provided that the Defendant was unable to receive the Flam for this weather year and the fourth year Flam,” and interfere with the operation of the restaurant business of the victimized person by allowing the customers to leave the place.

5. On July 21, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the restaurant business of the victimized party by avoiding disturbance, such as “I see this dog, I see this dog, I see this morale,” and seeing the voice,” thereby interfering with the restaurant business of the victimized party at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the statement of a wooden person H);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow