logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.11.25 2015고단842
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 842"

1. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant issued an order for alcoholic beverages and alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 260,000,00,000, including two diseases, beer, and beer, 100,000,000,000 won, to the victim E who is the owner of the business, as if the Defendant would normally pay the amount to the victim E, who is the owner of the business.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the above liquor to the victim because he did not have any means of payment such as money or credit card.

Nevertheless, the defendant was provided with the above alcohol and alcohol from the victim, and did not pay the price.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, has acquired 260,000 won pecuniary benefits.

2. At around 01:45 on September 15, 2015, the Defendant, at the place indicated in paragraph (1), arrested a flagrant offender with the facts constituting a crime listed in paragraph (1) from the F details belonging to the Innju Police Station at the place indicated in paragraph (1), and then sent a letter of confirmation to the effect that “a flagrant offender is given the opportunity to defend and confirm that he was given the opportunity to defend by being notified of the summary of the suspected crime at the time of arrest of a flagrant offender, the reason for arrest, the right to appoint a counsel, etc.” to the police officer I signed the letter of confirmation. The Defendant, upon confirmation of the above letter, stated the “J” as one’s pro rata name in the letter

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in the name of J, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 2, submitted a forged document to I, a police officer, who was aware of the forgery, as if it were a document duly formed.

4. On September 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 04:37, the Defendant: (b) received the interrogation of the facts constituting the crime set forth in paragraph (1) at the office of the criminal team of the Innju Police Station located in Sejong-ro, 50 ( Chang-dong); and (c) was a pro-friendly name in the column of the statement of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the police officer Assistant K as a police officer.

arrow