1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court for the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition of the judgment as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article

2. The Plaintiffs asserts to the purport that the status of refugee should be recognized on the grounds of appeal by this Court, as the grounds of appeal by this Court, the European European countries and Canada recognize the same full-time members as the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiffs continue to engage in religious activities even after entering the Republic of Korea, which have actively engaged in external religious activities that harm religious gambling in China, and are being paid high attention from the Chinese government and investigation agencies, and the Chinese government continues to engage in religious activities of the full-time members, and there is a danger of persecution against the Plaintiffs, and therefore, the status of refugee should be recognized.

The above assertion by the plaintiffs is not different from the contents of the plaintiffs' assertion in the first instance court. However, even if the evidence and the circumstances alleged in the first instance court are examined, it is difficult to view the plaintiffs to be a person with sufficient fear of persecution for religious reasons by the government of China. Thus, the first instance court's rejection of the plaintiffs' assertion is justifiable.

3. The first instance judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' claim is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed as they are without merit.