1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation concerning this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(1) The plaintiffs appeal that Canada and European countries recognize Canadian as refugees and the Chinese government continues to be fluority of religious activities, and therefore the plaintiffs' status should be recognized as refugees. However, even if the evidence submitted by the first instance court and this court are examined all of the evidence submitted in China, the plaintiffs' right to appeal is justifiable, and thus, it is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the first instance court's rejection of the plaintiffs' claim.