1. The Defendants are not guilty. 2. The summary of the judgment of innocence against the Defendants is published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is Defendant A and Defendant B as security guards, and Party B as the head of the same D security guard.

On November 2013, the Defendants conspired with the victim to the Daejeon Branch of the G Workers' Union, which is located in the World War World War F, and specified the victim as the victim's "E in order to recover the unfair dismissal from the office of the Daejeon Branch of the G Workers' Union," and brought about KRW 70,000 won of the operating and maintenance expenses paid by the head of the security service team to the company, and the expenses incurred in the cause of the problem brought about a close relationship with the security officer H, such as gifting high-priced alcoholic beverages to the security officer.

“As the fact was prepared in writing and the completion was true, the office director of the Daejeon District Office of the other Daejeon District Office of the Trade Union would spread to I, thereby undermining the honor of the victim.

2. Determination

A. In criminal proceedings, evidence that the Defendants alleged a criminal fact is false or false must be presented by the prosecutor. Criminal facts must be proven by a judge to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. If there is no evidence to form a conviction, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the Defendant, it should be determined in the interests of the Defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 92Do327, Mar. 23, 1993; 2012Do6522, Aug. 23, 2012).

3) First of all, according to the witness J, I, E, and K’s respective statements in the second protocol of trial, and the K’s content certification (19 pages), it is true that the amount of KRW 70,000,000, which the Defendants paid as operating expenses ( regardless of whether prior approval was obtained from the representative) would result in E’s own perception.