logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.04.02 2014고단2643
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. C’s co-principal Defendant and C, around May 5, 2014, in front of the E-way located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si on May 5, 2014, with the victim F(25 years of age)’s desire to take part in the victim F’s sexual traffic G. In that sense, C had the victim F’s desire to take part in the victim F’s sexual traffic.

C은 피해자 F이 욕설에 항의를 하자 이에 화가 나 피해자 F의 뺨을 2회 때리고, 피고인은 피해자 F의 친구인 피해자 H(25세)이 이에 대항하여 C의 멱살을 잡고 C을 향해 발길질을 하자, 발로 피해자 H의 허벅지를 1회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, inflicted an injury on the victim F, such as a chrokeum, which requires 14-day medical treatment, and assaulted the victim H.

2. On May 5, 2014, the sole criminal defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by the police officer of the Suwon Police Station I District, who was called out after receiving a report of criminal facts such as paragraph (1), at the place specified in paragraph (1) around 03:0 on May 5, 2014.

피고인은 현행범으로 체포된다는 사실에 화가 나, 피고인을 순찰차에 태우려던 경장 J에게 “너 뭔데 씨발새끼야, 너 쳐버린다”라고 말하면서 오른발로 그의 얼굴을 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Statement made by a witness F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Statement made by the witness J in the fourth trial records;

1. The entry of each part of witness K and L in the fifth trial records;

1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Each police statement made to the F and J;

1. Each statement K and L;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Chapter 4 of photograph (as to the obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant alleged that he intentionally did not assault the J. The Defendant testified that he was not a person who interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the J from this Court, such as satisfing the face of the Defendant and the victim’s fighting.

arrow