Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B car.
On February 14, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle as a job around 19:30, and moved the road in front of the apartment complex in the Daegu-gu Seoul apartment complex to the above apartment E-dong speed.
Since there is an apartment complex managed by the parking blockingr, in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to live well on the front side and the left side, and to safely drive the accident to prevent the accident.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the victim F (31 years old) who was crossing the road from the right-hand side of the course to the left-hand side of the right-hand side as the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injuries, such as cage cages and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment from the victim due to the above occupational negligence.
2. The instant facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since a written agreement was submitted to the effect that the victim does not want punishment after the instant indictment, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act