The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the defendant B's appeal are all dismissed.

Of the appeal cost, the plaintiff, defendant C, D.

1. The Plaintiff’s grounds of appeal and the grounds of appeal by Defendant B against the Defendants by the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. The evidence submitted by the court of first instance is acknowledged as legitimate in fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance even if each of the evidence (No. 13, No. 14-1, No. 14-2, No. 12-16) submitted by the Defendants to the court of first instance (Evidence No. 14-2, No.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court in this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

Part 4 of the first instance court's 10th "Nos. 3 and 4" shall be written by "Nos. 3 and 4 Eul," and subparagraph 16 of the same paragraph shall be written by "Nos. 10-1 through 3 of the evidence No. 10", respectively.

2. In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B shall be accepted within the extent of the above recognition, and the remainder shall be dismissed as it is without merit. All of the claims against Defendant C and D shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal and defendant B's appeal are without merit, and all of them are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.