The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal for ex officio, and the prosecutor changed the term “private signature, perjury, and uttering of perjury” in the name of the crime in the indictment of the case No. 2013 Go-Ma3120 among the original judgment, into “facing private documents, forging of a private document, or uttering of a private investigation document,” and Article 239(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act from among applicable provisions of law into “Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act,” and Article 2-2 of the facts charged.

The title of the paragraph "private signature forgery and the use of a false investigation and signature" shall be construed as "Forgery of private documents, the use of a falsified investigation document", and Article 2-b of the contents thereof.

[1] Paragraph (1) of this Article, “A defendant, with the intention of exercising his authority, forged another’s signature without authority,” and Paragraph (2) of this Article, “A defendant, without authority, forged a notice of his/her right to refuse to make statements in the name of the above L, which is a private document pertaining to the certification of fact, and forged a notice of his/her right to refuse to make statements in the name of the

Paragraph (2) of Paragraph (2) of the same Article stated that "the defendant filed an application for modification of a bill of amendment with the effect that "the defendant, at the same time and at the same place, submitted a written confirmation of the right to refuse to make a forged statement, a written report of the driver with the driver with the driver with the driver with the driver with the driver with the knowledge of the circumstances, and exercised it," and since the subject of the trial was changed by this court's permission, the judgment of the court below

3. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment below is reversed, and it is again decided as follows, without examining the defendant's argument of unfair sentencing.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the evidence admitted by the court are as follows. The summary of the facts charged in the judgment of the court below is as follows.

The title of paragraph (1) shall be "private signature, forgery, and .