logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.31 2017고정1382
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person driving B Costaex vehicles on duty.

On January 31, 2017, the above vehicle was operated at around 09:10, and the right-hand turn was made to the right-hand turn to the apartment in the direction of the right-hand market in the direction of the right-hand market.

It is an intersection where traffic is frequent.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether he/she should not report well the situation of the front, left, and right-hand traffic before entering the intersection and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and did not discover the amount of DNA car driven by the victim C (35 years, South) who is in the opposite opposite line among the left-hand turn, and did not discover the amount of DNA car, and the front side of the victim's vehicle and the front part of the damaged vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by negligence in the course of performing his duties, such as light fluoral salt, fluoral base, and fluoral base, which require the victim's treatment for about 2 weeks, and the Defendant suffered injury to the fluor E (three fluor, female) in need of medical treatment for 10 days.

2. The same accident as “A” on the violation of the Road Traffic Act caused physical damage equivalent to KRW 2,586,791 to the damaged vehicle.

3. On January 31, 2017, around 09:10 on the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Motor Vehicle Damages, around 20km from the 09:10 p.m., the Plaintiff driven approximately 20km without purchasing a mandatory insurance policy at approximately 31 m. in the sphere of the area of Suwon-si Shin-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Fact-finding survey report, diagnostic certificate, on-site and vehicle photographs, estimates of vehicles, and inquiries about mandatory insurance;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black boxes and video CDs;

1. Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and the compensation for automobile damages concerning criminal facts.

arrow