logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.10.10 2018가단3186
건물인도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) As from April 1, 2018, KRW 6,400,00 and above.

Reasons

Article 1 of the Civil Act provides that “The Defendant shall sign and seal in blank, while recognizing the fact of signing and sealing on the lease agreement.” However, the circumstance that the Defendant first signed and sealed only upon the completion of the entire or part of the document belongs to this example, so there is a need for reasonable and reasonable grounds and indirect counter-proof, etc. to support the presumption of the authenticity of the completed document (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 94Da11590, Oct. 14, 1994; 2001Da11406, Apr. 11, 2003).” In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in subparagraph 2, the Plaintiff paid to the Defendant the Plaintiff the deposit amount of KRW 3 million, monthly rent 400,000,000,000 from June 21, 2016 to June 2013, 2016 to June 26, 2016.”

I would like to say.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff and pay the unpaid rent of KRW 6.4 million (=4 million x 16 months) and the money calculated by the ratio of KRW 400,000 per month from April 1, 2018 to the completion date of delivery of the said real estate.

arrow