Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Of the instant crimes, the crime of fraud in the issuance of the visa is not likely to be committed by defrauding money by actively taking advantage of the imminent addresses of the victims whose sojourn is uneasy, and the charge of fraud in the construction cost is likely to be punished even before the Defendant committed the crime of a similar veterinary method, and is disadvantageous to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant had been punished by committing the crime of a similar veterinary method.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime, that the defendant agreed with the court below among the victims C and agreed with the victim E and F, that the victim E and F agreed with the court below, that the court below deposited 1.9 million won in the court below for the victim H, and 3.4 million won in the court below.

Taking into account all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, criminal records, background leading to the commission of the offense, details of the offense, amount of damage, and circumstances after the commission of the offense, the lower court’s punishment has been agreed upon or partially deposited in the trial.

Even if it is so, it can not be deemed improper because it is too heavy or uneasible.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.