Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
Judgment of the first instance.
Reasons
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "Extended Real Estate Agent" in Section 2, Section 18 of the first instance court's ruling was extended; "I Licensed Real Estate Agent" in Chapter 5 is dismissed as "I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office"; "At the fifth to sixth to the sixth to the sixthth of the first instance court's ruling ("65 million won or less") shall be used as follows; evidence proving that the defendant is bona fide and submitted in the first instance court's ruling, and the result of the court's order to submit each financial transaction information on the National Bank Pary Financial Center Head of the Supreme Court of the first instance, and the director of the National Bank Pary Financial Center of the first instance and the director of the National Bank Preliminary Branch of the first instance court's order to submit each financial transaction information on the Director of the National Bank Preliminary Branch of the first instance court (No. 5. 7 of the first instance court's ruling), and Article 20 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 40 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(2) On April 10, 201, 200 won, 65 million won was delivered directly to A on April 10, 2013 to M on April 10, 2013; KRW 697,497, and KRW 15,000,000 to O on April 11, 2013; and on April 23, 2013, M paid KRW 30,032,745 with interest on the loan of the instant real estate provided and borrowed from the said association as security by M to the Incheon Fisheries Cooperatives (However, the difference 269,758 won was not paid in the calculation of interest repaid between A and the Defendant on the said association); KRW 200,000,000 to M through Incheon Fisheries Cooperatives; and the Plaintiff paid KRW 200,000,000 to M on April 10, 2013, despite the fact that the instant real estate was fully paid by the Defendant’s ownership transfer registration.