Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 9, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) the Defendant was unable to pay the taxi fee at the D police box located in the Namyang-si C on August 9, 2015; (b) the Defendant did not return home, but did not return home, and (c) the police officer who was under investigation at the police box to a separate case at the police box and did not return home, and was able to take the face again for 40 minutes. The Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance that the Defendant took place in the state of the police box for about 40 minutes.

2. The Defendant, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 1, was arrested of a flagrant offender under suspicion of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Disturbing the revocation of an official order), and received a written confirmation that the Defendant read it to seal the police box to the least leaps.

The defendant does not affix a seal to the confirmation document.

After words, documents used by public offices that thrown away tear in hand without any reason were damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the second date);

1. A written statement of the main officer;

1. A certificate for damage;

1. Application of each investigation report, each photographic video-related statute;

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of disturbance for revocation in the official document), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (a point of disturbance for damage in the official document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment does not have any different criminal records from the defendant since 1993, and the circumstances leading the defendant to commit the instant crime, etc.