1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the fourth floor of the building listed in the attached Table 1 list, the section 1, the section 1, the section 1, the section 1, the section 2.

In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap 1 through 7, the plaintiff is the co-owner of the building listed in the annexed Table 1 list (hereinafter "the building in this case"). The defendant (hereinafter "the defendant company") without any legal authority, without any legal authority, occupied part of 132 square meters inside the fourth floor of the building in this case, which connects each point of the attached Form 1 in order to the outer wall of the building in this case, and installed two photographs advertising board on the outer wall of the building in this case, and attached two photographs of the attached Form 2 on the side of the entrance of the above occupied part of the building in this case [the non-party C, the representative of the defendant company, can be seen to have attached the above part of the fourth floor (i.e., the above occupied part) of the building in this case to the defendant company and attached the above advertising board to the non-party 2, and thus, the plaintiff and the non-party 1 company did not have any legal authority to remove the above part of the building in the attached Form 3.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and all of them are accepted.