logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.04.04 2013노190
공문서위조등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal ex officio, the prosecutor applied for the amendment to a bill of indictment as follows, and this court permitted it as stated in the facts charged at the trial. This part is the remainder of the judgment of the court below and the concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the court below cannot all maintain it.

3. If so, the lower court, as seen earlier, should be entirely reversed. Thus, without examining the Defendant’s assertion, the lower judgment is reversed pursuant to Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following is again decided after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts constituting the offense against the defendant recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence is as follows, except for the modification of paragraphs 2 through 5 of the facts constituting the offense of the court below, and therefore, it is identical to each corresponding column of the court below's judgment. Thus, it is cited in accordance with

[However, in Part V of the summary of the evidence of the court below, it is clear that the "investigation Report (victimJ Data)" in Part V is an error in the investigation report (victim I Data), and thus, it is corrected ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.

A. A. For the purpose of exercising a around that time, the Seoul Northern District Court’s Dongdaemun District Court’s registration office of Dongdaemun-gu with the fixed date indicated in the name of the Seoul Northern District Court and forged the fixed date in the name of the Seoul Northern District Court’s registry office, an official document, affixed the fixed date on the front of each charter contract forged as above with the fixed date affixed thereto.

B. Around that time, E’s resident registration certificate, the owner of the aforementioned D Apartment 25 Dong 1502, in preparation for the confirmation of the lessor from the lending company when applying for the loan as above with the false lease contract.

arrow