logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 11. 09. 선고 2017두54180 판결
(심리불속행) 구매대행이 아닌 독립된 수출업자로서 자신의 계산과 책임하에 수출한 것[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-63530 ( dated 30, 2017)

Title

(ps) An independent exporter who is not a buying agency but a buying agency, and who is exported under his own account and responsibility.

Summary

(C) In light of the above legal principles, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant’s conversion of the won currency into the won currency as of the payment date of export price is reasonable and reasonable, and there is no error to the extent of the grounds for revocation of the instant disposition.

Related statutes

Article 9 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2017Du54180 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing Value-Added Tax

Plaintiff and appellant

AA

Defendant, Appellant

D Head of the tax office

The second instance decision

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-63530 ( June 30, 2017)

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court-2014-Gu 2229 ( October 30, 2015)

Imposition of Judgment

November 9, 2017

Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow