1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including those resulting from the participation, shall be all included.

1. Grounds for the decision on layoff and review of this case;

A. The intervenor, etc. 1) manufactures and sells products using the technology of TFT-L CD (Thin TWnist Lquidal Dral Dospyspyspyspyspyspyspying devices, etc. The intervenor mainly produces and sells products using liquid displayers, organic electric power plant development and ores, technical research, services consignment, etc., and Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “BOE”) from among flat displays by the flat panel. The intervenor, in November 25, 2002, was separated from the business sector operated as L CD headquarters in the modern electronic in the modern electronic in 1989 and was established as a separate company on November 25, 2002.

(1) At the time of commencement of rehabilitation proceedings on September 2006, 2006, 100% of the shares of BOE, a major shareholder, was retired without compensation, and in 2008, the mission was changed to SV (Prime Vew International Co. Ltd. Ltd, and in 2010, E INK Holding (hereinafter referred to as “E”).

[2] The National Metal Trade Union (hereinafter “instant Trade Union”) is a national industrial trade union established on February 28, 2001 under the National Democratic Trade Union Federation of Korea established on February 28, 2001, whose target was nationwide metal and related industrial workers.

The Intervenor’s workplace includes the Hadice Branch of the Gyeonggi-do Branch of the Labor Relations Adjustment (hereinafter “instant Trade Union”) and the Hadice Trade Union, a company-level trade union, composed of the Intervenor’s employees belonging to the Intervenor.

As of March 31, 2015, the Labor Relations Commission of this case was comprised of 201 members, and 133 members, including Hadice Trade Union. However, the Plaintiffs were all workers of the Intervenor, and all of the employees of the Labor Relations Commission of this case.

B. On June 2008, the Intervenor to the labor-management agreement of this case and the labor-management agreement of this case concluded the labor-management agreement (hereinafter “this case’s labor-management agreement”) and the main contents are as follows.

1. Sale prohibition: 51% of the shares of one shareholder for the next three years;