Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On March 9, 2016, the Daegu District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. at the Daegu District Court on October, 201, which became final and conclusive on March 17, 2016.

Defendant

A was a person who operated a game hall with the trade name "F Gameland" in Daegu-gu around September 2015, and Defendant B was an employee of the above game hall.

person is a person.

No one shall engage in a business to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, from September 7, 2015 to April 14, 2015, Defendant A conspired with the Defendants to employ Defendant B as an employee and paid the cash to customers. Defendant B, from the stairs of the third floor of the above building, was engaged in the business of exchanging intangible results acquired through the use of game water in a way that the rest of the amount calculated by deducting 10 percent from the commission fees by receiving subscription tickets from the above game site customers, and return them to customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each written statement in B;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: In applying investigation reports (the attachment of a suspect A case written indictment and confirmation of the details of proceedings of trial), the text of the judgment, search data of the case, and copies of the judgment (Tgu District Court 2016 No. 9);

1. The Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of respective Game Industry; Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who handles concurrent crimes: After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1);

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act ( considered as favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Defendant B: Reasons for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act and Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A [whether the sentencing guidelines are applied] is concurrent crimes by the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the sentencing guidelines do not apply to Defendant A [decision of sentencing].