beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on March 20, 2015, at the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 8 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended sentence, and 3,000,000 won of a fine for violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts, etc., and the judgment is the same year.
9. 5. Final and conclusive. On April 8, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and a fine of KRW 7,00,000 for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on the same year.
8. 20. A final and conclusive date.
Defendant
B, C, and D have made a false invitation to foreigners by using the “E” called Pestacom.
Defendant
B, on April 27, 2015, Defendant A, who was aware of while engaging in sexual traffic mediation before the early police officer, stated that “I would give KRW 300,000 in return for the invitation per Egypt per Egypt” to Defendant A. On April 27, 2015, the said Party A had the said Party establish “F”, which is a Egypt, established around April 27, 2015.
Since then, around May 6, 2015, Defendant A, Defendant B, and C notarized the invitation letter stating the false fact as if they had a business relationship with the above “F” at the H law office located in Bupyeong-si, Busan, the H law office, including I ( South, J), K ( South, and L), and then sent the said invitation letter to D, and the said D sent it to the entry hub in Egypt through international mail.
In addition, on May 13, 2015 and May 27, 2015, two Egypts, respectively, presented a false invitation letter to the public official in charge of entry inspection at the Incheon International Public Port, but the entry was refused.
As such, the Defendants, in collusion with C and D, invited foreigners to enter the Republic of Korea by improper means.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D or C;
1. A copy of an immigration computer system related to the guarantee of invitation of victims in the relevant case;
1. A previous conviction: Each resident's inquiry, inquiry of criminal records and investigation records, reporting of the previous convictions of each disposition, and reporting of the results thereof;