beta
Text
1. For the plaintiffs:
A. Defendant D’s each of the KRW 90,000,000 and each of them shall be annually from May 30, 2014 to October 6, 2015.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The relevant Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a company that performs an information and communications construction business, etc. under Article 307 of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government F Building (hereinafter “instant building”), and Plaintiff B is a person who engages in wholesale and retail business under the trade name of “G” under Article 306 of the same building.
The Defendant Jeong Young-chul is the owner of the above 306 and 405 of the above 307 above (hereinafter “the instant officetel”), and the Defendant D is the lessee of the instant officetel from the Defendant Jung-ju’s oil business, and the Defendant C intended to operate the instant officetel with the Defendant D.
In the instant instant officetel, from May 27, 2014, the construction project was carried out from the point of May 27, 2014, the air and ventilation pipes for the air and gas (hereinafter “instant construction project”). On May 30, 2014, one of the construction business operators was able to enjoy large amounts of water by destroying the sprinkler pipes in the instant officetel.
As a result, there was an accident in which the following 306 musical instruments and parts and electronic equipment in 307 were flooded (hereinafter “instant accident”).
[Ground of recognition] Defendant D: Defendant D is liable for damages incurred to the Plaintiffs pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Code since the contract for the instant construction works and the instant accident occurred due to neglecting the duty of care for the construction works, and is also liable for damages incurred to the Plaintiffs pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Code. Furthermore, Defendant D bears the responsibility under Article 758 of the Civil Code and the Building Management Rules of this case as well as Article 758 of the Civil Code.
Therefore, the defendant D is jointly with the defendant Jeong-ju Co., Ltd., C, and E, due to the accident in this case.